<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Out in America Features&#187; supreme court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://features.outinamerica.com/tag/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://features.outinamerica.com</link>
	<description>Featured Content from OiA!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:43:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Court orders Prop. 8 trial videos to remain sealed</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2012/02/03/court-orders-prop-8-trial-videos-to-remain-sealed/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2012/02/03/court-orders-prop-8-trial-videos-to-remain-sealed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=14647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal appeals court barred public release Thursday of videos of the trial over California&#8217;s ban on same-sex marriage, saying the trial judge, at the insistence of the U.S. Supreme Court, had promised that the recordings would not be broadcast. The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco did not say how or [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2012/02/03/court-orders-prop-8-trial-videos-to-remain-sealed/">Court orders Prop. 8 trial videos to remain sealed</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2012/02/03/court-orders-prop-8-trial-videos-to-remain-sealed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposition 8 Backers Have Standing to Defend It, Court Rules</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/11/17/proposition-8-backers-have-standing-to-defend-it-court-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/11/17/proposition-8-backers-have-standing-to-defend-it-court-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=14453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning, the CA Supreme Court ruled that the proponents of Prop 8 do have standing under state law to appeal the decision in Perry v. Brown: …In response to the question submitted by the Ninth Circuit, we conclude, for the reasons discussed above, that when the public officials who ordinarily defend a challenged state law [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/11/17/proposition-8-backers-have-standing-to-defend-it-court-rules/">Proposition 8 Backers Have Standing to Defend It, Court Rules</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/11/17/proposition-8-backers-have-standing-to-defend-it-court-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prop. 8 Donors Have No Right to Anonymity</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/11/10/prop-8-donors-have-no-right-to-anonymity/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/11/10/prop-8-donors-have-no-right-to-anonymity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=14411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge says donors to the $40 million campaign that banned same-sex marriage in California aren&#8217;t entitled to the anonymity that the U.S. Supreme Court has granted to minor parties operating in a hostile climate. via. Read the full article @ Prop. 8 Donors Have No Right to Anonymity Read more articles @ our [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/11/10/prop-8-donors-have-no-right-to-anonymity/">Prop. 8 Donors Have No Right to Anonymity</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/11/10/prop-8-donors-have-no-right-to-anonymity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calif. Gay Marriage Ban Faces Pivotal Hearing</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/09/06/calif-gay-marriage-ban-faces-pivotal-hearing/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/09/06/calif-gay-marriage-ban-faces-pivotal-hearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=14044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California’s same-sex marriage ban faces its next legal test Tuesday when the state’s highest court attempts to shed light on whether the voter-approved measure’s backers have legal authority to appeal the federal ruling that overturned Proposition 8. The California Supreme Court is scheduled to hear an hour of arguments on that question, which could prove [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/09/06/calif-gay-marriage-ban-faces-pivotal-hearing/">Calif. Gay Marriage Ban Faces Pivotal Hearing</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/09/06/calif-gay-marriage-ban-faces-pivotal-hearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Perry Signs Pledge against Same-sex Marriage</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/08/30/rick-perry-signs-pledge-against-same-sex-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/08/30/rick-perry-signs-pledge-against-same-sex-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national organization for Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=14016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick Perry signed a pledge Friday to back a federal constitutional amendment against gay marriage. The move is a reversal from only a month ago when the Texas governor said he supported individual states&#8217; rights and that he was fine with New York&#8217;s approval of same-sex marriage. The pledge by the National Organization for Marriage [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/08/30/rick-perry-signs-pledge-against-same-sex-marriage/">Rick Perry Signs Pledge against Same-sex Marriage</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/08/30/rick-perry-signs-pledge-against-same-sex-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brazil Approves Civil Unions For Gay Couples</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/05/06/brazil-approves-civil-unions-for-gay-couples/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/05/06/brazil-approves-civil-unions-for-gay-couples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 17:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay couple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=13247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a unanimous decision reached by the 10 justices, Brazil’s Supreme Court found that, “Those who opt for a homosexual union cannot be treated less than equally as citizens,” Justice Camen Lucia was quoted by the AP. This means that couples in “stable” civil unions now share the same rights as married couples: including retirement benefits, [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/05/06/brazil-approves-civil-unions-for-gay-couples/">Brazil Approves Civil Unions For Gay Couples</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/05/06/brazil-approves-civil-unions-for-gay-couples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court OK&#8217;s Westboro Protests</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/03/02/supreme-court-oks-westboro-protests/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/03/02/supreme-court-oks-westboro-protests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westboro Baptist Church]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=12727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court today ruled 8-1 to overturn a $5M judgment against Westboro Baptist Church, saying that the First Amendment protects their right to picket the funerals of military members. via. Read the full article @ Supreme Court OK&#8217;s Westboro Protests Read more articles @ our blogBecome a fan on FacebookFollow us on Twitter<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/03/02/supreme-court-oks-westboro-protests/">Supreme Court OK&#8217;s Westboro Protests</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/03/02/supreme-court-oks-westboro-protests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Supreme Court Says Non-biological Parent in Same-sex Relationship Entitled to Visitation</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/02/18/state-supreme-court-says-non-biological-parent-in-same-sex-relationship-entitled-to-visitation/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/02/18/state-supreme-court-says-non-biological-parent-in-same-sex-relationship-entitled-to-visitation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visitation rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=12622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Arkansas Supreme Court has upheld the award of visitation rights to a woman whose partner in a same-sex relationship gave birth to a child, a ruling the court says follows the law even though Arkansas has outlawed homosexual marriage. via. Read the full article @ State Supreme Court Says Non-biological Parent in Same-sex Relationship [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/02/18/state-supreme-court-says-non-biological-parent-in-same-sex-relationship-entitled-to-visitation/">State Supreme Court Says Non-biological Parent in Same-sex Relationship Entitled to Visitation</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/02/18/state-supreme-court-says-non-biological-parent-in-same-sex-relationship-entitled-to-visitation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Rejects Appeal by D.C. Marriage Equality Opponents</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/01/18/supreme-court-rejects-appeal-by-d-c-marriage-equality-opponents/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/01/18/supreme-court-rejects-appeal-by-d-c-marriage-equality-opponents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health & Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district of columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REJECTED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=12287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court by Bishop Harry Jackson and opponents of same-sex marriage in the District of Columbia has been rejected. Jackson had been seeking to put a proposal on the ballot to overturn the District’s marriage law that gives same-sex couple the same rights to marriage as their heterosexual counterparts. via. [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/01/18/supreme-court-rejects-appeal-by-d-c-marriage-equality-opponents/">Supreme Court Rejects Appeal by D.C. Marriage Equality Opponents</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/01/18/supreme-court-rejects-appeal-by-d-c-marriage-equality-opponents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court expected to rule on Gay Marriage in D.C.</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/01/13/supreme-court-expected-to-rule-on-gay-marriage-in-d-c/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/01/13/supreme-court-expected-to-rule-on-gay-marriage-in-d-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=12248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to announce an opinion Tuesday on whether to allow voters to repeal the Washington D.C. equal marriage law. Jackson v. the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics is scheduled to be discussed at a private conference among the Justices on Friday, according to the Washington Blade. via. Read the [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/01/13/supreme-court-expected-to-rule-on-gay-marriage-in-d-c/">Supreme Court expected to rule on Gay Marriage in D.C.</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/01/13/supreme-court-expected-to-rule-on-gay-marriage-in-d-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding the Ninth Circuit Ruling in Prop 8 Case Denying Intervention and Certifying Question to California Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/01/05/understanding-the-ninth-circuit-ruling-in-prop-8-case-denying-intervention-and-certifying-question-to-california-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/01/05/understanding-the-ninth-circuit-ruling-in-prop-8-case-denying-intervention-and-certifying-question-to-california-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 14:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=12149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied Imperial County’s attempt to intervene in the federal court challenge to Proposition 8, the 2008 ballot measure that stripped the freedom to marry from same-sex couples in California. The Ninth Circuit also asked the California Supreme Court to clarify whether the group that placed Prop 8 on [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/01/05/understanding-the-ninth-circuit-ruling-in-prop-8-case-denying-intervention-and-certifying-question-to-california-supreme-court/">Understanding the Ninth Circuit Ruling in Prop 8 Case Denying Intervention and Certifying Question to California Supreme Court</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2011/01/05/understanding-the-ninth-circuit-ruling-in-prop-8-case-denying-intervention-and-certifying-question-to-california-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NC State Supreme Court Rules Against Gay Adoption</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/12/21/nc-state-supreme-court-rules-against-gay-adoption/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/12/21/nc-state-supreme-court-rules-against-gay-adoption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health & Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=11972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what may be a precedent setting move, North Carolina&#8217;s state Supreme Court has voided a second-parent adoption case in which an openly lesbian state legislator had adopted the biological son of her former partner. via. Read the full article @ NC State Supreme Court Rules Against Gay Adoption Read more articles @ our blogBecome [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/12/21/nc-state-supreme-court-rules-against-gay-adoption/">NC State Supreme Court Rules Against Gay Adoption</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/12/21/nc-state-supreme-court-rules-against-gay-adoption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Elena Kagan Recuses Herself from Scotus Appeal on DADT</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/16/justice-elena-kagan-recuses-herself-from-scotus-appeal-on-dadt/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/16/justice-elena-kagan-recuses-herself-from-scotus-appeal-on-dadt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DADT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[log cabin republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=11465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supreme Court Justice, newly inducted, Elena Kagan recused herself from the future SCOTUS decision, indicating she won’t be a part of the nine-person bench when LCR’s lawsuit lands before the Supreme Court, in the case denying the Log Cabin Republicans’ request to knock down the Ninth Circuit’s stay, which kept DADT alive despite a federal [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/16/justice-elena-kagan-recuses-herself-from-scotus-appeal-on-dadt/">Justice Elena Kagan Recuses Herself from Scotus Appeal on DADT</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/16/justice-elena-kagan-recuses-herself-from-scotus-appeal-on-dadt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Won’t Stop DADT Enforcement</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/16/supreme-court-won%e2%80%99t-stop-dadt-enforcement/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/16/supreme-court-won%e2%80%99t-stop-dadt-enforcement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DADT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=11462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has just been reported that the U.S. Supreme Court will not halt the discharges of openly gay service members under “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”—meaning that the law will remain in effect while the government appeals Judge Virginia Phillips’ October ruling that it is unconstitutional. VIA. Read the full article @ Supreme Court Won’t Stop [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/16/supreme-court-won%e2%80%99t-stop-dadt-enforcement/">Supreme Court Won’t Stop DADT Enforcement</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/16/supreme-court-won%e2%80%99t-stop-dadt-enforcement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Department Asks Supreme Court Not To Intervene In DADT Case</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/11/justice-department-asks-supreme-court-not-to-intervene-in-dadt-case/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/11/justice-department-asks-supreme-court-not-to-intervene-in-dadt-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DADT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=11417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As news of the Pentagon’s Working Group report echoes around the world, the Obama administration has urged the Supreme Court of the United States to not get involved in the case centering around Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. A federal appeals court will be considering the issue next year, but for now there is a stay [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/11/justice-department-asks-supreme-court-not-to-intervene-in-dadt-case/">Justice Department Asks Supreme Court Not To Intervene In DADT Case</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/11/justice-department-asks-supreme-court-not-to-intervene-in-dadt-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Log Cabin Republicans Asks Supreme Court To Toss Out 9th Circuit&#8217;s DADT Stay, Immediately Halt Discharges</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/08/log-cabin-republicans-asks-supreme-court-to-toss-out-9th-circuits-dadt-stay-immediately-halt-discharges/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/08/log-cabin-republicans-asks-supreme-court-to-toss-out-9th-circuits-dadt-stay-immediately-halt-discharges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 17:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DADT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[log cabin republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=11384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an emergency request to reverse the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals&#8217; 2-1 decision to grant a stay, thus blocking Judge Virginia Phillips&#8217; injunction of Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell, the Log Cabin Republicans are asking the Supreme Court to toss out the stay and keep DADT from being enforced while the government appeals the decision. [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/08/log-cabin-republicans-asks-supreme-court-to-toss-out-9th-circuits-dadt-stay-immediately-halt-discharges/">Log Cabin Republicans Asks Supreme Court To Toss Out 9th Circuit&#8217;s DADT Stay, Immediately Halt Discharges</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/08/log-cabin-republicans-asks-supreme-court-to-toss-out-9th-circuits-dadt-stay-immediately-halt-discharges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Cares Who Wins The Elections &#8211; opinion</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/01/who-cares-who-wins-the-elections-opinion/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/01/who-cares-who-wins-the-elections-opinion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=11208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Either way, we will not win on November 2nd.  Sure, party hangers-on hoping for sweetheart contracts and other favors care, and are working overtime using the issues we care about, and fears about what &#8220;the other guy&#8221; might do to us, to try to make us care who wins as well.  But these party operatives have horses [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/01/who-cares-who-wins-the-elections-opinion/">Who Cares Who Wins The Elections &#8211; opinion</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/11/01/who-cares-who-wins-the-elections-opinion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AFER files brief to 9th Circuit; Plaintiffs defend Judge Walker’s Prop 8 decision</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/10/19/afer-files-brief-to-9th-circuit-plaintiffs-defend-judge-walker%e2%80%99s-prop-8-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/10/19/afer-files-brief-to-9th-circuit-plaintiffs-defend-judge-walker%e2%80%99s-prop-8-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perry v. Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=10963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American Foundation for Equal Rights filed its response brief to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals just before the midnight deadline. The plaintiffs in the landmark Perry v. Schwarzenegger case that overturned Proposition 8 filed their brief with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals today, reiterating the clear unconstitutionality of the initiative that [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/10/19/afer-files-brief-to-9th-circuit-plaintiffs-defend-judge-walker%e2%80%99s-prop-8-decision/">AFER files brief to 9th Circuit; Plaintiffs defend Judge Walker’s Prop 8 decision</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/10/19/afer-files-brief-to-9th-circuit-plaintiffs-defend-judge-walker%e2%80%99s-prop-8-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida Won’t Appeal Ruling That Found Gay Adoption Ban Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/10/13/florida-wont-appeal-ruling-that-found-gay-adoption-ban-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/10/13/florida-wont-appeal-ruling-that-found-gay-adoption-ban-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=10855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF) announced Tuesday evening that it would not appeal a court ruling that found the state&#8217;s gay adoption ban unconstitutional. Last month, a 3-judge appeals court unanimously upheld a lower court&#8217;s ruling that found the law to be unconstitutional and to have “no rational basis.” “We had weighed [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/10/13/florida-wont-appeal-ruling-that-found-gay-adoption-ban-unconstitutional/">Florida Won’t Appeal Ruling That Found Gay Adoption Ban Unconstitutional</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/10/13/florida-wont-appeal-ruling-that-found-gay-adoption-ban-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All Aboard The Crazy Train &#8211; General Gayety</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/10/12/all-aboard-the-crazy-train-general-gayety/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/10/12/all-aboard-the-crazy-train-general-gayety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evangelical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Gayety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westboro Baptist Church]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=10845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lately the crazy train has picked up speed. I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s the upcoming midterm elections or people are scared by gay court victories or what, but we&#8217;re in a period of nutty. Take David Barton. Please. An evangelical minister, teacher at (Glenn) Beck University and former vice chairman of the Texas Republican Party, [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/10/12/all-aboard-the-crazy-train-general-gayety/">All Aboard The Crazy Train &#8211; General Gayety</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/10/12/all-aboard-the-crazy-train-general-gayety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor speaks out against those seeking to alter the Iowa courts via election</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/09/09/sandra-day-oconnor-speaks-out-against-those-seeking-to-alter-the-iowa-courts-via-election/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/09/09/sandra-day-oconnor-speaks-out-against-those-seeking-to-alter-the-iowa-courts-via-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Day O'Connor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=10258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[O&#8217;Connor, 80, voiced her opinions in favor of Iowa&#8217;s current merit-based judge selection system. Last month, Republican Bob Vander Plaats started a campaign to unseat three Iowa Supreme Court justices up for reelection. O&#8217;Connor only spoke for about 10 minutes, but she was emphatic in her belief that appointing judges on a merit-based system as [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/09/09/sandra-day-oconnor-speaks-out-against-those-seeking-to-alter-the-iowa-courts-via-election/">Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor speaks out against those seeking to alter the Iowa courts via election</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/09/09/sandra-day-oconnor-speaks-out-against-those-seeking-to-alter-the-iowa-courts-via-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado Gov. picks first Latina and out lesbian for Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/09/09/colorado-gov-picks-first-latina-and-out-lesbian-for-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/09/09/colorado-gov-picks-first-latina-and-out-lesbian-for-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=10233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gov. Bill Ritter today appointed Monica Marie Marquez to the Colorado Supreme Court. She will become the first Latina and first out lesbian to serve on the state’s highest court when her appointment becomes effective on Nov. 30, 2010. VIA. Read the full article @ Colorado Gov. picks first Latina and out lesbian for Supreme Court [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/09/09/colorado-gov-picks-first-latina-and-out-lesbian-for-supreme-court/">Colorado Gov. picks first Latina and out lesbian for Supreme Court</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/09/09/colorado-gov-picks-first-latina-and-out-lesbian-for-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexican Cardinal Claims Proof Of Bribery In Same-Sex Marriage Ruling</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/19/mexican-cardinal-claims-proof-of-bribery-in-same-sex-marriage-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/19/mexican-cardinal-claims-proof-of-bribery-in-same-sex-marriage-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=9807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently, the Roman Catholic Cardinal who alleged that the mayor of Mexico City bribed the Supreme Court of that nation has proof of the ill deeds, though he will not say what the proof is, where it came from, or allowed anyone to inspect it. Cardinal Juan Sandoval Iñiguez alleged that Mayor Marcelo Ebrard bribed [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/19/mexican-cardinal-claims-proof-of-bribery-in-same-sex-marriage-ruling/">Mexican Cardinal Claims Proof Of Bribery In Same-Sex Marriage Ruling</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/19/mexican-cardinal-claims-proof-of-bribery-in-same-sex-marriage-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domestic partnership petition case back in court</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/12/domestic-partnership-petition-case-back-in-court/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/12/domestic-partnership-petition-case-back-in-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic partner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=9675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge ruled Wednesday that signed petitions calling for a state vote on expanded domestic partnerships for gay couples are barred from public release while he hears arguments on whether to block them for good. The U.S. Supreme Court had ruled in June that release of the signatures does not violate constitutional rights, but [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/12/domestic-partnership-petition-case-back-in-court/">Domestic partnership petition case back in court</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/12/domestic-partnership-petition-case-back-in-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexican High Court: All Mexican States Must Recognize Gay Marriages</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/11/mexican-high-court-all-mexican-states-must-recognize-gay-marriages/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/11/mexican-high-court-all-mexican-states-must-recognize-gay-marriages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=9650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By a 9-2 vote, the Supreme Court of Mexico has ruled the marriages of same-sex couples performed in Mexico City must be recognized by all Mexican states. The court had also ruled last week that the Mexico City’s law permitting marriage rights for same-sex couples is constitutional, rejecting an appeal by Mexican federal officials, arguing [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/11/mexican-high-court-all-mexican-states-must-recognize-gay-marriages/">Mexican High Court: All Mexican States Must Recognize Gay Marriages</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/11/mexican-high-court-all-mexican-states-must-recognize-gay-marriages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexican Supreme Court Upholds Mexico City Same-Sex Marriage Law</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/06/mexican-supreme-court-upholds-mexico-city-same-sex-marriage-law/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/06/mexican-supreme-court-upholds-mexico-city-same-sex-marriage-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=9585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By an 8-2 vote, The Mexican Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of Mexico City’s law allowing same-sex marriages. The Mexican High court ruled that the law did not violate the constitution and said that nowhere does the Mexican Constitution define what a family is, thus was valid in allowing gay couples to possibly adopt [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/06/mexican-supreme-court-upholds-mexico-city-same-sex-marriage-law/">Mexican Supreme Court Upholds Mexico City Same-Sex Marriage Law</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/06/mexican-supreme-court-upholds-mexico-city-same-sex-marriage-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate to confirm Kagan for the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/05/senate-to-confirm-kagan-for-the-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/05/senate-to-confirm-kagan-for-the-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=9541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her confirmation assured, Elena Kagan is on the brink of becoming the fourth woman ever to serve as a Supreme Court justice. The Senate is set Thursday to confirm President Barack Obama’s nominee, whose addition to the court will mark the first time three female justices have served concurrently. VIA. Read the full article @ [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/05/senate-to-confirm-kagan-for-the-supreme-court/">Senate to confirm Kagan for the Supreme Court</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/08/05/senate-to-confirm-kagan-for-the-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>N.J. Supreme Court declines to hear gay marriage case</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/07/27/n-j-supreme-court-declines-to-hear-gay-marriage-case/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/07/27/n-j-supreme-court-declines-to-hear-gay-marriage-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=9366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a split decision, the N.J. State Supreme Court has declined to hear a case from six same-sex couples seeking the right to marry, saying the case needs to wind its way through the lower courts first. VIA Read the full article @ N.J. Supreme Court declines to hear gay marriage case Read more articles [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/07/27/n-j-supreme-court-declines-to-hear-gay-marriage-case/">N.J. Supreme Court declines to hear gay marriage case</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/07/27/n-j-supreme-court-declines-to-hear-gay-marriage-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is The Obama Administration Going to Appeal the Federal Marriage Ban Ruling?</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/07/12/is-the-obama-administration-going-to-appeal-the-federal-marriage-ban-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/07/12/is-the-obama-administration-going-to-appeal-the-federal-marriage-ban-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense of marriage act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Coakley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=9102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama has never been in favor of marriage equality, however, there are troublesome rumblings that he is going to go so far as to directly stand behind the Federal Defense of Marriage Act. A Boston Federal Judge declared DOMA unconstitutional. Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley and the activist group, Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, who [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/07/12/is-the-obama-administration-going-to-appeal-the-federal-marriage-ban-ruling/">Is The Obama Administration Going to Appeal the Federal Marriage Ban Ruling?</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/07/12/is-the-obama-administration-going-to-appeal-the-federal-marriage-ban-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay asylum seekers win appeal in UK</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/07/07/gay-asylum-seekers-win-appeal-in-uk/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/07/07/gay-asylum-seekers-win-appeal-in-uk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[persecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=9010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two gay men who said they faced persecution in their home countries have the right to asylum in the UK, the Supreme Court has ruled. The panel of judges said it had agreed &#8220;unanimously&#8221; to allow the appeals from the men, from Cameroon and Iran. They had earlier been refused asylum on the grounds they [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/07/07/gay-asylum-seekers-win-appeal-in-uk/">Gay asylum seekers win appeal in UK</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/07/07/gay-asylum-seekers-win-appeal-in-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds gay marriage ban</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/30/wisconsin-supreme-court-upholds-gay-marriage-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/30/wisconsin-supreme-court-upholds-gay-marriage-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=8893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld the state&#8217;s constitutional ban on gay marriage and civil unions in a unanimous ruling Wednesday. The court&#8217;s 7-0 ruling concluded that the constitutional amendment was properly put to voters in a statewide referendum in 2006. Justices rejected a lawsuit that claimed the amendment violated a rule limiting constitutional amendments to a single [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/30/wisconsin-supreme-court-upholds-gay-marriage-ban/">Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds gay marriage ban</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/30/wisconsin-supreme-court-upholds-gay-marriage-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin High Court To Decide Future Of Same-Sex Marriage Ban</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/29/wisconsin-high-court-to-decide-future-of-same-sex-marriage-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/29/wisconsin-high-court-to-decide-future-of-same-sex-marriage-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=8880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wisconsin Supreme Court is expected to decide tomorrow whether that state’s the 2006 constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage and civil unions should be struck down. The Justices are scheduled to hear a suit brought by Dr. William McConkey, a professor at UW-Oshkosh, that says the bans on same-sex marriage and civil unions should have [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/29/wisconsin-high-court-to-decide-future-of-same-sex-marriage-ban/">Wisconsin High Court To Decide Future Of Same-Sex Marriage Ban</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/29/wisconsin-high-court-to-decide-future-of-same-sex-marriage-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court rules religious group can’t bar gays</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/29/supreme-court-rules-religious-group-can%e2%80%99t-bar-gays/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/29/supreme-court-rules-religious-group-can%e2%80%99t-bar-gays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual orientation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of california]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=8871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court this morning said a Christian student group that sought both funding and recognition by the University of California’s Hastings College of Law cannot deny membership to gays and lesbians. Hastings’ policy forbids official recognition of student groups that discriminate on the basis of religious views or sexual orientation.  But the Christian [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/29/supreme-court-rules-religious-group-can%e2%80%99t-bar-gays/">Supreme Court rules religious group can’t bar gays</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/29/supreme-court-rules-religious-group-can%e2%80%99t-bar-gays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court on R-71: Names on anti-gay rights petition public</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/24/supreme-court-on-r-71-names-on-anti-gay-rights-petition-public/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/24/supreme-court-on-r-71-names-on-anti-gay-rights-petition-public/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Referendum 71]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=8829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the names of people who signed petitions in an attempt to overturn a new gay rights law in Washington must be made public, a victory for state officials who said the case was a test of open government laws. Justices ruled 8-1 in a case called Doe V. Reed. [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/24/supreme-court-on-r-71-names-on-anti-gay-rights-petition-public/">Supreme Court on R-71: Names on anti-gay rights petition public</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/24/supreme-court-on-r-71-names-on-anti-gay-rights-petition-public/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California gay marriage trial ends with a bang</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/17/california-gay-marriage-trial-ends-with-a-bang/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/17/california-gay-marriage-trial-ends-with-a-bang/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Vaughn Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=8700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A six-month trial on whether to overturn a California ban on gay marriage ended dramatically on Wednesday when a lawyer defending the prohibition said he did not need evidence to prove the purpose of marriage. The case is likely headed for the U.S. Supreme Court no matter how District Court Chief Judge Vaughn Walker rules [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/17/california-gay-marriage-trial-ends-with-a-bang/">California gay marriage trial ends with a bang</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/06/17/california-gay-marriage-trial-ends-with-a-bang/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House already asked Elena Kagan those personal questions in 2008</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/05/14/white-house-already-asked-elena-kagan-those-personal-questions-in-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/05/14/white-house-already-asked-elena-kagan-those-personal-questions-in-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 14:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=8099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You think the first time the White House was going to ask Elena Kagan about her propensity for men or women was going to be her Supreme Court nomination? Nah. They were asking her these personal questions when she wanted the solicitor general job. [ via Queerty ] Read the full article @ White House [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/05/14/white-house-already-asked-elena-kagan-those-personal-questions-in-2008/">White House already asked Elena Kagan those personal questions in 2008</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/05/14/white-house-already-asked-elena-kagan-those-personal-questions-in-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elena Kagan&#8217;s friends: She&#8217;s not gay</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/05/12/elena-kagans-friends-shes-not-gay/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/05/12/elena-kagans-friends-shes-not-gay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 17:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=8072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elena Kagan is not a lesbian, one of her best friends told POLITICO Tuesday night, responding to persistent rumors and innuendo about the Supreme Court nominee’s personal life. “I’ve known her for most of her adult life and I know she’s straight,” said Sarah Walzer, Kagan’s roommate in law school and a close friend since [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/05/12/elena-kagans-friends-shes-not-gay/">Elena Kagan&#8217;s friends: She&#8217;s not gay</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/05/12/elena-kagans-friends-shes-not-gay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama nominates Kagan to Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/05/10/obama-nominates-kagan-to-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/05/10/obama-nominates-kagan-to-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 18:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=8042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama nominated Solicitor General Elena Kagan to succeed retiring Justice John Paul Stevens on the U.S. Supreme Court. Obama evoked former Justice Thurgood Marshall’s, for whom Kagan clerked early in her career, when he described his nominee’s qualifications to sit on the court. &#8220;That understanding of law, not as an intellectual exercise or words [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/05/10/obama-nominates-kagan-to-supreme-court/">Obama nominates Kagan to Supreme Court</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/05/10/obama-nominates-kagan-to-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Supreme Court Pick Monday</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/05/07/obamas-supreme-court-pick-monday/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/05/07/obamas-supreme-court-pick-monday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 16:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=7979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look for President Obama to name his Supreme Court pick Monday, and look for it to be Solicitor General Elena Kagan, a former Harvard Law dean. The pick isn’t official, but top White House aides will be shocked if it’s otherwise. Kagan’s relative youth (50) is a huge asset for the lifetime post. [ via [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/05/07/obamas-supreme-court-pick-monday/">Obama&#8217;s Supreme Court Pick Monday</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/05/07/obamas-supreme-court-pick-monday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court skeptical on keeping R-71 names private</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/04/29/court-skeptical-on-keeping-r-71-names-private/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/04/29/court-skeptical-on-keeping-r-71-names-private/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitioners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Referendum 71]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=7799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical Wednesday about keeping secret the names of people who signed a petition to repeal Washington state&#8217;s gay rights law, suggesting citizens cannot always hide behind anonymity if they want to be heard. Opponents of gay rights want the court to keep the names private to avoid intimidation by the other [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/04/29/court-skeptical-on-keeping-r-71-names-private/">Court skeptical on keeping R-71 names private</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/04/29/court-skeptical-on-keeping-r-71-names-private/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court hears dispute on &#8220;everything-but-marriage&#8221; petition signers&#8217; names</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/04/28/court-hears-dispute-on-everything-but-marriage-petition-signers-names/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/04/28/court-hears-dispute-on-everything-but-marriage-petition-signers-names/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=7784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gay rights opponents are asking the Supreme Court to protect the anonymity of the signers of a petition that sought a vote to overturn Washington state&#8217;s domestic partnership rights. The case being argued at the high court Wednesday weighs the right to political speech, unfettered by fear of intimidation, against transparency in government. [ via [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/04/28/court-hears-dispute-on-everything-but-marriage-petition-signers-names/">Court hears dispute on &#8220;everything-but-marriage&#8221; petition signers&#8217; names</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/04/28/court-hears-dispute-on-everything-but-marriage-petition-signers-names/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iowa Celebrates First Anniversary Of Gay Marriage Ruling</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/04/05/iowa-celebrates-first-anniversary-of-gay-marriage-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/04/05/iowa-celebrates-first-anniversary-of-gay-marriage-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anniversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=7299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gay rights advocates in Iowa are counting down the minutes to Saturday. Some will gather Friday in Ames at the Unitarian Universalist church for a potluck dinner. Others will celebrate Saturday at a wine tasting hosted at the Cedar Rapids Gay and Lesbian Resource Center. Everyone is excited. Excited that despite numerous attacks from opponents, [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/04/05/iowa-celebrates-first-anniversary-of-gay-marriage-ruling/">Iowa Celebrates First Anniversary Of Gay Marriage Ruling</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/04/05/iowa-celebrates-first-anniversary-of-gay-marriage-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay-marriage advocates in N.J. resume legal fight</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/19/gay-marriage-advocates-in-n-j-resume-legal-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/19/gay-marriage-advocates-in-n-j-resume-legal-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lambda legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=6888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advocates for gay and lesbian couples are headed back to New Jersey&#8217;s Supreme Court to resume their attempt to legalize same-sex marriage. Lambda Legal, a gay-rights legal group, filed a motion to the high court Thursday seeking a ruling that would let same-sex couples wed. The filing argues that the state has failed to comply [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/19/gay-marriage-advocates-in-n-j-resume-legal-fight/">Gay-marriage advocates in N.J. resume legal fight</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/19/gay-marriage-advocates-in-n-j-resume-legal-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives, I&#8217;m begging you: Leave animals out of your gay marriage talking points</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/17/conservatives-im-begging-you-leave-animals-out-of-your-gay-marriage-talking-points/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/17/conservatives-im-begging-you-leave-animals-out-of-your-gay-marriage-talking-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idiot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. J.D. Hayworth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talking points]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=6821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure we love our pets, but do we really &#8216;love&#8217; our pets? Those crazy conservatives are always looking for ridiculous ways to skew the public&#8217;s opinion on same-sex marriage. Over the weekend, former Rep. J.D. Hayworth, who&#8217;s running against John McCain in Arizona&#8217;s Republican Senate primary, resurrected a preposterous old saw. Lamenting the Massachusetts Supreme [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/17/conservatives-im-begging-you-leave-animals-out-of-your-gay-marriage-talking-points/">Conservatives, I&#8217;m begging you: Leave animals out of your gay marriage talking points</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/17/conservatives-im-begging-you-leave-animals-out-of-your-gay-marriage-talking-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pennsylvania Senate Committee Takes Up Gay Marriage Ban Bill and Tables It</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/16/pennsylvania-senate-committee-takes-up-gay-marriage-ban-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/16/pennsylvania-senate-committee-takes-up-gay-marriage-ban-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=6800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A key Pennsylvania Senate committee will take up the issue of gay marriage today. UPDATE: The bill before the Pennsylvania Senate Judiciary Committee has stalled, the AP reports. Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee will consider Senator John H. Eichelberger, Jr&#8217;s joint resolution that aims to define marriage as a heterosexual union in the state constitution, [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/16/pennsylvania-senate-committee-takes-up-gay-marriage-ban-bill/">Pennsylvania Senate Committee Takes Up Gay Marriage Ban Bill and Tables It</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/16/pennsylvania-senate-committee-takes-up-gay-marriage-ban-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court to hear Fred Phelps case</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/10/supreme-court-to-hear-fred-phelps-case/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/10/supreme-court-to-hear-fred-phelps-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fred phelps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funeral arrangements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mili]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=6662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court continues its unpredictable foray into LGBT-related legal conflicts &#8212; this week announcing that it will decide whether a protester has a First Amendment right to use a private funeral service as a staging ground for their hate speech against gays. [ via Bay Windows Photo: JC Wilmore ] Read the full [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/10/supreme-court-to-hear-fred-phelps-case/">Supreme Court to hear Fred Phelps case</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/10/supreme-court-to-hear-fred-phelps-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Challenge To DC Marriage Equality Law</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/03/supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-challenge-to-dc-marriage-equality-law/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/03/supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-challenge-to-dc-marriage-equality-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chief Justice John Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district of columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington dc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=6465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chief Justice John Roberts signaled what may be a trend within the United States Supreme Court of not hearing cases revolving around marriage equality. In refusing to hear a case involving Washington DC’s marriage law, Roberts wrote for the majority “It has been the practice of the court to defer to the decisions of the [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/03/supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-challenge-to-dc-marriage-equality-law/">Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Challenge To DC Marriage Equality Law</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/03/03/supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-challenge-to-dc-marriage-equality-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Decision Protecting Children Born to Same-Sex Couples</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/02/23/u-s-supreme-court-rejects-challenge-to-decision-protecting-children-born-to-same-sex-couples/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/02/23/u-s-supreme-court-rejects-challenge-to-decision-protecting-children-born-to-same-sex-couples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health & Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biological]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual orientation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=6339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the United States Supreme Court denied review in a custody dispute involving a non-biological lesbian mother whose former partner, the child’s biological mother, was seeking to strip her of any parental rights. “I am so grateful that my relationship with my six-year-old daughter is legally protected,” said Charisma. “I love my daughter dearly, and [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/02/23/u-s-supreme-court-rejects-challenge-to-decision-protecting-children-born-to-same-sex-couples/">U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Decision Protecting Children Born to Same-Sex Couples</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/02/23/u-s-supreme-court-rejects-challenge-to-decision-protecting-children-born-to-same-sex-couples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iowa Legislature Votes to Protect Equality</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/02/10/iowa-legislature-votes-to-protect-equality/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/02/10/iowa-legislature-votes-to-protect-equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=6139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Iowa legislature acted yesterday to reject an effort to repeal the existing marriage equality law. Opponents of same-sex marriage have attempted to override the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision by amending the state constitution to make marriage between one man and one woman. Polls show the majority of Iowans consider the issue settled and do not [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/02/10/iowa-legislature-votes-to-protect-equality/">Iowa Legislature Votes to Protect Equality</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/02/10/iowa-legislature-votes-to-protect-equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High court to weigh dispute over gay bias.</title>
		<link>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/01/25/high-court-to-weigh-dispute-over-gay-bias/</link>
		<comments>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/01/25/high-court-to-weigh-dispute-over-gay-bias/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>OIA Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://features.outinamerica.com/?p=5809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court agreed Monday to decide whether a Christian student group&#8217;s right to religious liberty and the freedom of association can trump a university&#8217;s ban on discrimination against gays and lesbians. [ Topix ] Read the full article @ High court to weigh dispute over gay bias. Read more articles @ our blogBecome a fan [...]<p><p>Read the full article @ <a href="http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/01/25/high-court-to-weigh-dispute-over-gay-bias/">High court to weigh dispute over gay bias.</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://features.outinamerica.com">Read more articles @ our blog</a></li><li><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Out-in-America-Cities-Network/47260151574">Become a fan on Facebook</li><li><a href="http://twitter.com/outinamerica" target="_blank">Follow us on Twitter</a></li>
</ul>
</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://features.outinamerica.com/2010/01/25/high-court-to-weigh-dispute-over-gay-bias/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

